Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:45:46 +0000
From:      George Cox <gjvc@gjvc.com>
To:        Steve Hovey <shovey@buffnet.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: DIRBLKSIZ and NFS_DIRBLKSIZ
Message-ID:  <20000218104546.C14651@extremis.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10002171310180.18585-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>; from shovey@buffnet.net on Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 01:12:28PM -0500
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.10002171310180.18585-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17/02 13:12, Steve Hovey wrote:

> I have a mail server, where user home dirs are NFS mounted (so it can see
> things like .forward in the user home dirs) Im thinking smoe of the slug
> down/overhead may be in the NFS time it takes to get into and examine a
> home dir..

Hmmmm.


> Im thinking maybe I could optimize it alittle if I nfs mount with a
> higher than default DIRBLKSIZ but Im not sure (the -I param) .  Anyone
> with insight on this?  Or how I might calc a more optimal setting?

Well, yes you can tweak the NFS block size.  But in the context of this
message you haven't _really_ explained the symptom.  Are you saying that
directory lookups are slow over NFS?  What about general reading and
writing of files?


gjvc

-- 
[gjvc]
<gjvc@gjvc.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000218104546.C14651>