From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 16 14:00:04 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA06478 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 14:00:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA06453; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 14:00:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 14:00:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612162200.OAA06453@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports Cc: From: "Eric L. Hernes" Subject: Re: ports/2220: Submitted port of swig 1.0 Reply-To: "Eric L. Hernes" Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR ports/2220; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Eric L. Hernes" To: Bruce Gingery Cc: "Eric L. Hernes" , FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, beazley@cs.utah.edu Subject: Re: ports/2220: Submitted port of swig 1.0 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 15:54:55 -0600 Bruce Gingery writes: >Probably not, but I looked and didn't find it, so went ahead. Shoot, >wish I'd seen yours. Dang. > >Well, yes it is different. Your's was to 1.0b1, this is to >v1.0 release. No, jkh's original was 1.0b1, my upgrade was from b1 to the release. > >The reason I didn't see yours was a port name of SWIG contrary >to naming standards, but sure, enough, on another look there yours >is in 2.1.5-RELEASE/ports/devel/SWIG. Yea, that's how Jordan created it. I didn't ask why, but he asked if I wanted to take it over, so I did... Now I see a 1.1b2 on the master site, is it worth upgrading before 2.2 goes out? > > Bruce > eric. -- erich@lodgenet.com http://rrnet.com/~erich erich@rrnet.com