From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  3 12:56:43 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5AD4837B401; Tue,  3 Jun 2003 12:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 429BB43F85; Tue,  3 Jun 2003 12:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h53JuekA015807;
	Tue, 3 Jun 2003 13:56:40 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 13:55:59 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20030603.135559.102654754.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: nate@root.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030603101424.N23167@root.org>
References: <20030602234329.T22029@root.org>
	<20030603.092003.75391391.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<20030603101424.N23167@root.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: sam@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ubsec ubsec.c ubsecvar.h
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 19:56:43 -0000

In message: <20030603101424.N23167@root.org>
            Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes:
: On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <20030602234329.T22029@root.org>
: >             Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes:
: > : The end result, I thought, was that jhb@ was going to look into
: > : bus_teardown_intr() to change it to install a null handler with proper
: > : locking (intr masking?).  I hate to start this topic again but I've
: > : brought it up a couple times and still haven't heard that this has been
: > : addressed.
: >
: > that wasn't the end result.
: 
: Please send me a reference to the result as I appear to have missed it.

There was no clear cut result in the end.  At the end of the
conversation there were a number of side conversations that basically
said that this idea cannot possibly work in this case or that case.
I'm drafting a design for driver locking that will address these
issues.

Warner