Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:13:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Ludo Koren <lk@tempest.sk> To: rizzo@icir.org Cc: tscrum@aaawebsolution.com Subject: Re: limiting bandwith Message-ID: <200404141513.i3EFDR5R084225@lk106.tempest.sk> In-Reply-To: <20040414075644.A95599@xorpc.icir.org> (message from Luigi Rizzo on Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:56:44 -0700)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I wrote `interactive' (ticks), and I meant addresses that are
>> used to connect to ssh, web, etc (interactive processes). All
>> these addresses are NAT-ed. For these, your setup is working
>> fine. Thank you very much.
>>
>> The problem, I still have, is the following: the SMTP is
>> flowing through, I am not relaying e-mail on this host. It
>> seems to me, I cannot put together a rule which pass the
>> traffic and add it to the queue except when I use keep-state
>> flag. In this setup (keep-state), Luigi wrote it does not work.
> i said your configuration does not work the way you want. It
> is possible to write a proper configuration that does what you
> want but it is left as an exercise to the reader.
That I had understand. The problem is, the exercise I don't know to
do, even I tried hard several days... call me stupid...
The setup is: pass 2 mail servers without NAT and add the traffic from
the LAN to WAN to the queue and limit it (or weigth it).
If I add:
ipfw add queue 3 tcp from A to B 25
ipfw queue 3 config weight 1 pipe 10 mask src-ip 0x000000ff
ipfw pipe 10 config bw 256Kbit/s
and remove all rules with keep-state, it stops working.
> cheers luigi
Regards,
lk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404141513.i3EFDR5R084225>