From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 27 4: 7:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from boom.calcasieu.com (mail.calcasieu.com [209.99.46.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC1A14C58 for ; Thu, 27 May 1999 04:07:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dread@calcasieu.com) Received: from coypu.bb.calcasieu.com (coypu.bb.calcasieu.com [192.168.3.21]) by boom.calcasieu.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA08084 for ; Thu, 27 May 1999 06:07:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 06:07:31 -0500 (CDT) Organization: Calcasieu Lumber From: Don Read To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Windows NT Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 27-May-99 Markus Döhr wrote: > etc. Although all the *BSD and *nix are obviously much more stable and much > faster, many companies don't have any specific knowledge of programming HTML > nor > PHP-3. They'd like to have a ready solution for their need, only > customization > has to be done, no real programming and adaption. They want install on monday > and run productive at thursday. primary web-server, Monday 18:30 2.1.6 Tuesday 07:30 3.2 and the NT has what advantage ? Regards, --- Don Read dread@calcasieu.com EDP Manager dread@texas.net Calcasieu Lumber Co. Austin TX -- Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message