From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Dec 2 9: 7:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBE137B401 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:07:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.purplecat.net (mx1.purplecat.net [208.133.44.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE92843EAF for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:07:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@skyrunner.net) Received: (qmail 58167 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 17:07:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO micron) (208.150.25.130) by mx1.skyrunner.net with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 17:07:40 -0000 From: "Peter Brezny" To: "Alexander Leidinger" Cc: Subject: RE: traffic prioritization. Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:07:30 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20021201144939.0001f7d7.Alexander@Leidinger.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Alexander, Thanks a bunch for the tip. Looks like I need to do some more reading in the man pages! Do you have an example of what you described below that I could look at to minimize syntax battles? Thanks again, Peter Brezny Skyrunner.net -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Leidinger [mailto:Alexander@Leidinger.net] Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:50 AM To: Peter Brezny Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: traffic prioritization. On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 17:05:11 -0500 "Peter Brezny" wrote: > I feel sure that it can be done with it. I'm vuagely familiar with the > etinc.com's bwmgr package which seems to do traffic prioritization. Define a pipe and some queues which feed their data into the same pipe, the data of the queues is then priorized depending on the weight of the queues. The data with the lowest priority doesn't get stopped, it will find it's way through the pipe, it's just that higher priorized data gets more of the max. bandwith of the pipe than lower priorized data. Bye, Alexander. -- Secret hacker rule #11: hackers read manuals. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message