From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jun 19 0:53:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B441237B403; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 00:53:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@starjuice.net) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15CGKO-000Nk3-00; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:53:36 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: Chris Wasser , arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: netbsd rc system diff In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:58:57 MST." <20010618175856.A540@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:53:36 +0200 Message-ID: <91266.992937216@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:58:57 MST, "David O'Brien" wrote: > NO! Please discuss them here first to make sure the proposed patch does > something needed. I don't think it's a biggy. Effectively, Chris was suggesting a patch to NetBSD's rc. Luke's smart enough to understand that, I think. Chris copied me on his message to Luke, and Luke response was level-headed. He basically questioned the usefulness of the patch and came up with some solid arguments against it. My plan is still to ignore all non-critical changes until we have exactly what NetBSD has, modulo necessary porting changes. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message