From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 06:03:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4493437B401 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5F043FAF for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:03:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h5HD33kA068018; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:03:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:01:57 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030617.070157.51705104.imp@bsdimp.com> To: craig@xfoil.gank.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030615211800.1a8c1ece.craig@xfoil.gank.org> References: <20030615211800.1a8c1ece.craig@xfoil.gank.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple cardbus devices? (RFI) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:03:05 -0000 : I've tried an awful hack of forcing a minimum size of 0x1000 for all : resource allocations made by cardbus devices to make sure they're : page-aligned and it seems to be working. There are occasional : watchdog timeouts on the xl device, but it is at least functioning at : the same time as the USB. Reading the spec tells me that all memory allocation needs to be on a 4k boundary. Looks like the code fails to enforce that. Warner