From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 13:07:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB15106566C for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:07:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from smtpq1.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432CF8FC15 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.152] (helo=smtp20.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkyOl-0006jO-1z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:07:11 +0200 Received: from 524944af.cm-4-2b.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([82.73.68.175] helo=mail.nagual.nl) by smtp20.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkyOj-0006us-Qj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:07:09 +0200 Received: from [192.168.11.34] (192.168.11.34) by yanta (Axigen) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 0ECB39; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:07:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4E2C1914.7000106@nagual.nl> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:07:32 +0200 From: Dick Hoogendijk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "C. P. Ghost" References: <4E2BF0BB.9040308@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1QkyOj-0006us-Qj X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (cached, score=1.646, vereist 5, BAYES_40 -0.00, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D 0.67, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.98) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamScore: s X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: dick@nagual.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: emacs-nox11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:07:12 -0000 Op 24-7-2011 12:46 schreef C. P. Ghost: > Since there are no X11 libs in emacs despite all those options > being set anyway, I suppose that setting WITHOUT_X11 creates > a non-X11 emacs. > > I'm using the following port (normal emacs, with WITHOUT_X11 set): > > % echo /var/db/pkg/emacs* > /var/db/pkg/emacs-23.3_1,2 > > But I don't know if X dependencies are being pulled in when the > port is being built with all those options. Yes, but the latter is just what worries me. I want a console version of emacs. It's a server and I absolutely do not want any X dependencies cluttering my system. Ports are great but sometimes they have bitten me in this respect. Sure, I can do a dry run on a virtual freebsd machine, but that is not at all that fast. So I'm still looking for people who have done this ans _know_ it will work out OK.