From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 18 11:11:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D49416A4CE for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:11:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA8843D41 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:11:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5IBAPYj006136 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:10:26 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i5IBAPhj006133 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:10:25 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:10:24 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040618111024.GA5660@comp.chem.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: CONFLICTS usage question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:11:26 -0000 Hi folks, Is it all right if a wildcard pattern listed in CONFLICTS matches the port's package itself? Here's why I'm asking: There is a port "mail/bogofilter" that has 2 child ports, "mail/bogofilter-qdbm" and "mail/bogofilter-tdb". I'm about to add the 3rd child port for it, "russian/ru-bogofilter". Presently, the existing ports cross-list each other in CONFLICTS. It seems easier to have a single CONFLICTS setting, in the master port, that reads: CONFLICTS= bogofilter-* [a-z][a-z]-bogofilter-* Will that be legal in our ports framework? -- Yar