From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Aug 19  3:10:14 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF3A37B405
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 03:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A886043E7B
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 03:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7JAA3JU064606
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 03:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7JAA3HI064605;
	Mon, 19 Aug 2002 03:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 03:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200208191010.g7JAA3HI064605@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Nick Hilliard <nick-list@netability.ie>
Subject: Re: conf/35178: ipfilter for IPV6 not availlable in rc.*
Reply-To: Nick Hilliard <nick-list@netability.ie>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR conf/35178; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Nick Hilliard <nick-list@netability.ie>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Cc: crist.clark@attbi.com
Subject: Re: conf/35178: ipfilter for IPV6 not availlable in rc.*
Date: 19 Aug 2002 11:05:46 +0100

 On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 08:37:05AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
 > The problem with that is ipfilter_active would not be available at
 > this point. It is local to the network_pass1() function in
 > rc.network. It is possible to make it global, but very kludgey,
 > passing data between the scripts in that way. In my scripts, I've just
 > dropped the flush completely. It doesn't really seem all that
 > necessary to me.
 
 Crist,
 
 This pr + the patch you posted seem to have fallen through the cracks. 
 Could you consider committing it to -current without the flush?  It
 would be nice to get it into 4.7.
 
 Nick
 
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message