From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 30 03:49:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C1716A4BF; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 03:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mag.barnet.com.au (mag.barnet.com.au [218.185.88.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BBC43FA3; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 03:49:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from extmail.barnet.com.au (tim.direct.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.10.2]) by mag.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CDB28E5; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:49:10 +1000 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <3F508126000073D401C1ECCA@VIRUSCAN-127.0.0.1> Received: from k7.mavetju (tim.barnet.com.au [218.185.88.1]) by extmail.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA3D1E10; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:49:08 +1000 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EC0BF6A7101; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:49:07 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:49:07 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Stijn Hoop , Doug Barton , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030830104907.GH571@k7.mavetju> References: <20030830025225.D15016@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030830102532.GD88893@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030830103945.GG571@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030830103945.GG571@k7.mavetju> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/netpbm Makefile (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 10:49:13 -0000 On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 08:39:45PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:25:32PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 02:54:26AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > > Can someone please explain to me why fixing a plist necessitates bumping > > > portrevision? If I already have the port installed, the plist is already > > > broken. There is nothing about this fix that makes me want to reinstall > > > the port. > > > > There is for me -- I want the version of the port with the correct pkg-plist > > in case I want to deinstall the port and _not_ leave files/dirs behind. > > I wouldn't know if I have the correct version of the plist if they didn't > > bump PORTREVISION. > > I must say that I agree with him. With Stijn that is. Edwin, in progress of making a fool of himself (again) -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/weblog.php