From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun May 31 16:00:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B86338047 for ; Sun, 31 May 2020 16:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.kotowski@a9development.com) Received: from mail2.protonmail.ch (mail2.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "SwissSign Server Gold CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Zjgx5TsGz4K02 for ; Sun, 31 May 2020 16:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.kotowski@a9development.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 16:00:22 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=a9development.com; s=protonmail; t=1590940826; bh=b3KD+2nZnf3fOCRTArzn1SlOrsiKTlEJ8CkvQ384CKY=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EiZhYwuTYWAAt3bw/pUfAQLH18Iadp4RjAd3l9bV7SoFI5sxALfhBtfbCjCTDrk5+ rEa8CL9HtjAlkjGZ8hGPzFIagOEg6zYZhDYRO5Si960Uc+LNSMWqrDQoPjkiBLkFD8 wAfjPrywI1EenbYHWUpAwTuLFOOFVbGBLyYWVH3E= To: myfreeweb From: Dan Kotowski Cc: freebsd-arm Reply-To: Dan Kotowski Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Layerscape/QorIQ LX2160X Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <31D3FA64-8296-4CA5-92A2-F7FE7C4AE981@unrelenting.technology> References: <664db38a87ea8803be72af9738534994@unrelenting.technology> <8951311F-77F7-40B8-AEA0-F8CBCB1A05DE@yahoo.com> <4ad62e6669044f82e71a9d86fd493356@unrelenting.technology> <31D3FA64-8296-4CA5-92A2-F7FE7C4AE981@unrelenting.technology> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mail.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49Zjgx5TsGz4K02 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=a9development.com header.s=protonmail header.b=EiZhYwuT; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=a9development.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dan.kotowski@a9development.com designates 185.70.40.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dan.kotowski@a9development.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.81 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[dan.kotowski@a9development.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[a9development.com:s=protonmail]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SH_EMAIL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[0.0.0.1:email]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.70.40.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.962]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.06)[-1.061]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[185.70.40.22:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[a9development.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_PROHIBIT(0.00)[0.0.0.1:email]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.69)[-0.690]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[a9development.com,none]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.40.0/24, country:CH]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[185.70.40.22:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 16:00:30 -0000 > > > I've sent a link to a known firmware build before: > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yXSS1O1U8CmtwaIPfxNDkzhAClJGvErK/vie= w > > > Have you tried it? Any difference in FreeBSD/NetBSD, with NVMe? > > > > I decided to go back to the UEFI sources and have found some difference= s that I think need to be reconciled before moving forward. That said, I'm = not an ACPI wizard by any means - for me it's low-level mage spells at best= ... > > In https://github.com/SolidRun/edk2-platforms we have 2 different branc= hes that SolidRun seems to use: > > > > 1. LSDK-19.09-sr > > 2. master-lx2160a > > > > I've been building from the latter branch, but found some significant d= ifferences in the former that I think may be important to merge in. > > To me it seems like 19.09 is just outdated and doesn't have any benefits.= Ask the solidrun people to be sure. > > Either way, nothing here would fix the interrupt bug. It's our bug since = NetBSD works fine :( Any thoughts on the "Poll mode" comment below from the dts? We're still not= seeing any of the PHYs in either BSD. ``` &emdio1 { rgmii_phy1: ethernet-phy@1 { /* AR8035 PHY - "compatible" property not strictly needed */ compatible =3D "ethernet-phy-id004d.d072"; reg =3D <0x1>; /* Poll mode - no "interrupts" property defined */ }; }; ```