Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:06:19 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 240536] textproc/gtk-doc: make configure dependency on highlight explicit Message-ID: <bug-240536-6497-FvwZjJ7dLo@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-240536-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-240536-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bugzilla Automation <bugzilla@FreeBSD.org> has asked freebsd-gnome mailing = list <gnome@FreeBSD.org> for maintainer-feedback: Bug 240536: textproc/gtk-doc: make configure dependency on highlight explic= it https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240536 --- Description --- If textproc/source-highlight is installed when you run 'make -C textproc/gtk-doc configure', the configure phase will detect source-highlig= ht first before highlight. This makes gtk-doc implicitly dependent on source-highlight. If source-highlight is later removed, gtk-doc is broken (config.py contains a now invalid reference to source-highlight). This is solved by specifying --with-highlight=3Dhighlight for configure. While here, appease portlint a bit by moving USES earlier. I could see that this could merit a PORTREVISION bump, but this change shouldn't change packages that are currently built on the freebsd package servers (a poudriere gtk-doc build jail would not have the source-highlight package installed). QA: - poudriere textport: ok - portlint: ok
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-240536-6497-FvwZjJ7dLo>