From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Feb 8 12:28:03 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA26371 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 12:28:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from jaka.isd.state.in.us (jaka.isd.state.in.us [199.8.63.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA26365 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 12:28:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from klikes@isd.state.in.us) Received: from jaka.isd.state.in.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jaka.isd.state.in.us (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id PAA01803 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 15:27:57 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199902082027.PAA01803@jaka.isd.state.in.us> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: exmh 2.0.2 and wish8.0 eating memory on 3.0 Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 15:27:57 -0500 From: "Kevin T. Likes" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm running exmh on a 3.0-Stable system, installed from binaries. I've reinstalled exmh 2.0.2 and tcl and tk 8.0.4 since the upgrade, which I believe were the same versions running on the box before I upgraded. Before the upgrade, I noticed that wish8.0 processes seemed to grow slowly over time. This was an annoyance, but not really a problem. Now, however, I notice that occasionally the wish process suddenly starts taking a lot of CPU and memory. This means I can't comfortably leave exmh running overnight as I would like, so that exmh can have e-mail filed for the next morning. (Yes, I can do that with slocal, but exmh seems not to be able to track new messages as well.) Is this a known problem under Tcl/Tk 8.0.4? Would upgrading to 8.1.b1 fix it? Does exmh 2.0.2 work under 8.1.b1? --Kevin T. Likes To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message