From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Apr 21 21:30: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C4337B422 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 21:30:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f3M4U7l44317; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 21:30:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 21:30:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200104220430.f3M4U7l44317@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: misc/26727: glob() function bug in ftpd daemon: what is its status in v2.2.7 and v3.4 Reply-To: Kris Kennaway Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/26727; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kris Kennaway To: paulchef@starwon.com.au Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: misc/26727: glob() function bug in ftpd daemon: what is its status in v2.2.7 and v3.4 Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 21:25:57 -0700 --6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 02:02:21AM -0700, paulchef@starwon.com.au wrote: > glob() function. Shame on you guys for not separating data and code > into different segments like (excuse me) Windows does? What on earth does this have to do with data and code segments? I don't think you know what you're talking about. Kris --6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE64l1UWry0BWjoQKURAh4eAKC8pz9Ff0PQWWyuvzQb3Ih7D2PYiwCaAq48 6gv9oEIaSURWYdk3ALZSe24= =z6U1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message