From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 23:21:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-Hackers@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C4516A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan@digitaldaemon.com) Received: from digitaldaemon.com (digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16DA113C4AD for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan@digitaldaemon.com) Received: (qmail 76969 invoked by uid 98); 24 Apr 2007 23:21:31 -0000 Received: from 63.105.9.34 by digitaldaemon.com (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87/1195. Clear:RC:1(63.105.9.34):. Processed in 0.042571 secs); 24 Apr 2007 23:21:31 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: jan@digitaldaemon.com via digitaldaemon.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(63.105.9.34):. Processed in 0.042571 secs) Received: from digitaldaemon.com (HELO ?192.80.151.2?) (63.105.9.34) by digitaldaemon.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2007 23:21:31 -0000 Message-ID: <462E90FA.70004@digitaldaemon.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:21:30 -0400 From: Jan Knepper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mohacsi Janos References: <45F1C355.8030504@digitaldaemon.com> <20070310082316.K64466@mignon.ki.iif.hu> <4628D3EA.6060405@digitaldaemon.com> <20070422122342.Y32158@mignon.ki.iif.hu> In-Reply-To: <20070422122342.Y32158@mignon.ki.iif.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: Multiple IP Jail's patch for FreeBSD 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:21:33 -0000 Mohacsi Janos wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Jan Knepper wrote: > >> Mohacsi Janos wrote: >>> Hi Jan, >>> The problem with your patch is the missing IPv6 support. >> I know... So what you are saying it does not work? > > No. I am saying, that worth considering IPv6 support too. Definitely... especially since we better be prepared. As far as I know IPv6 is not widely being used (yet) so that would give time... With that regard I do not see an issue to include it for IPv4 now. >> I know... However... If you could get me a version of DragonFlyBSD >> that supports amd64 I might consider switching... > The drafonfly version already supports it. > > I don't want you to convince to switch to DragonFlyBSD. I *was* considering it some time before... However.. The reason has been mentioned... Thanks! Jan