Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:11:27 +0100
From:      Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jo?o Carlos Mendes =?iso-8859-2?Q?Lu=EDs?= <jonny@jonny.eng.br>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Hand on gmirror (Was: Re: gmirror bugs, how many?)
Message-ID:  <20041129151127.GN7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
In-Reply-To: <41AB37B8.7060303@jonny.eng.br>
References:  <41A4FD60.4050501@jonny.eng.br> <20041125224547.GB7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41A6B76F.4020101@jonny.eng.br> <20041126082340.GC7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41A78A47.3050309@jonny.eng.br> <20041128202759.GF7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41AB37B8.7060303@jonny.eng.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--9H9VVCLI5QJPfUsZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:52:40PM -0200, Jo?o Carlos Mendes Lu=EDs wrote:
+> >+>     Indeed, the -h option is what I wanted and the "bug" is in the=
=20
+> >+> manual. What would happen if I change the disc ID in this case?
+> >
+> >Your disk will not be detected as a mirror component, because hardcoded
+> >name is different.
+>=20
+> Oops.  Is there a check for that?  For example, let's say that ad0s1 got=
=20
+> renamed to ad1s1, and hardcoded a reference to ad0s1.  In this case,=20
+> there is a disk called ad0s1 in the system.  Is gmirror smart enough in=
=20
+> this case?

In this case ad1s1 will not be connected to the mirror (but don't worry,
ad0s1 will not be connected as well).

+> >+> sigesc::root jcmendes [553] disklabel mirror/vol0
+> >+> # /dev/mirror/vol0:
+> >+> 8 partitions:
+> >+> #        size   offset    fstype   [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
+> >+>   a: 16498864       16    unused        0     0
+> >+>   c: 16498880        0    unused        0     0         # "raw" part=
,=20
+> >+> don't edit
+> >+> sigesc::root jcmendes [554]
+> >+>=20
+> >+>   Seems good until now.  Except for the offset 16 of the "a" partiti=
on.=20
+> >+>  Is this necessary?  The man page says that the only sector reserved=
=20
+> >+> for metadata is the provider's last one.
+> >
+> >Ehh, "blame" disklabel(8). First 16 sectors are reserved for boot code.
+>=20
+> And why this does not happen with ad0s1, etc?

I think it should, only using sysinstall for this will not allocate those
sectors. Anyway, it has nothing to do with gmirror.

--=20
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.FreeBSD.org
pjd@FreeBSD.org                           http://garage.freebsd.pl
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

--9H9VVCLI5QJPfUsZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBqzwfForvXbEpPzQRAs7JAKCEXY6fr8cR0DPRTOxPSFbcpsepUwCg0GO7
q8RyX3VaibwJ+8je/KJcyRM=
=qucQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9H9VVCLI5QJPfUsZ--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041129151127.GN7232>