From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 16 21:55:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45FD16A4CE for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:55:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D5843D9A for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:55:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) j4GLtiJJ053035; Mon, 16 May 2005 23:55:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9CE8C6285; Mon, 16 May 2005 23:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:55:44 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Florian Hengstberger Message-ID: <20050516215544.GA1693@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Florian Hengstberger , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050516212544.GA1539@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tetex, latex, dvips X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:55:50 -0000 --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:31:08PM +0200, Florian Hengstberger wrote: > A tex live-cd? I wonder why this should be preferable to a port. TeXLive is a TeX distribution that you can install. I think it also includes a live-cd. > Anyway what's wrong with the latex port.=20 TeXLive contains more packages and they are better integrated. It uses Type1 or TrueType fonts for almost all font families. > But how to go the standard latex, xdvi, dvips way without > dvips? Like it or not, pdf(La)TeX is more and more becoming the standard. Xpdf is fine for viewing pdfs, and runs on more platforms than acrobat. > Finally what about latex3e if the've finished their work?? LaTeX3 (if it is ever finished) will be integrated into the different distributions. OTOH, even Leslie Lamport seems to think that LaTeX will fall into disuse in about five years. The consensus seems to be that ConTeXt is the most modern TeX macro package. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCiRbgEnfvsMMhpyURAvQ8AJwNSmb3FW2T+9w06sS7MSj/pmbWzQCfXUXB 8XpfrCygKSFz28ls5zklHOc= =Nqd3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--