From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Mon Dec 18 04:26:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42CAEA09B8; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:26:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA2256A723; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:26:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58AD01204; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 22:26:13 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 22:26:12 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Jan Beich Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon , ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r456578 - head/biology/hmmer Message-ID: <20171218042612.GB21904@lonesome.com> References: <201712180232.vBI2WlFi034525@repo.freebsd.org> <20171218034504.GB21707@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:26:14 -0000 OK. Here's the deal. I would prefer to work _with_ you to fix problems in the Ports Collection. I will happily admit that I cannot do it all by my own. I welcome any and all help. But what I am *trying* to chainsaw through hundreds of errorlogs. There is a 100% chance I will miss something. If this is the attitude you wish to have, I will create PRs for each and every problem and assign them to _you_ directly and then you may do as you wish. My goal is to get aarch64/armv7 up to snuff with amd64 ASAP: preferably by the end of the year. Where possible, I will fill in the bits for powerpc64 and sparc64, which I run here at the house (as well as armv7 runs, and armv6 exp-runs). But if you think it's so important to have no regressions on i386 -- an obsolete architecture -- for ports that are in dusty corners of the ports collection -- in preference to trying to attract attention enough to get them fixed on aarch64/armv7, then please take it to portmgr. Or fix them yourself. I am tired of this. mcl