From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 8 13:42:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3898106564A; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [IPv6:2001:6c8:130:400::6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601FD8FC0C; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 417461CC27; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 15:42:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 15:42:03 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: bf1783@gmail.com Message-ID: <20100708134202.GP31442@droso.net> References: <201007081251.o68CpcBF050697@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100708132111.GO31442@droso.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2VXyA7JGja7B50zs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 7.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Brendan Fabeny Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzma Makefile ports/archivers/paq Makefile ports/archivers/ppmd-7z Makefile ports/devel/abi-compliance-checker Makefile ports/devel/api-sanity-autotest Makefile ports/devel/distorm Makefile ports/devel/libdisasm ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:42:04 -0000 --2VXyA7JGja7B50zs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 01:29:04PM +0000, b. f. wrote: > >> Log: > >> Change my ports to use my FreeBSD.org email address. > > > > This is a sweeping commit explicitly not allowed during a slush. Also, > > I am not seeing approval by one of your mentors. Please take more care. >=20 > Sorry, I'll do so. I forgot to mention in the commit message that > makc@ gave his approval, and miwi@ did not object to the commit. And > my reading of the criteria for sweeping change suggested that this > would be admissible because it was a "cosmetic change", mostly to leaf > ports (with the exception of textproc/wv). If I misunderstood what is > considered to be cosmetic, please let me know. I wanted to get this > in because I've already missed the auto-assign of two PRs related to > ports that I maintain. >=20 While you're right that this specific commit probably won't cause any harm, it's still better not to. With the release about a week away, I'm sure you could have waited a few days more :-) Best, -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing (o_ _o) http://droso.org Ceterum censeo \\\_\ /_/// Carthaginem esse delendam <____) (____> erwin@lansing.dk --2VXyA7JGja7B50zs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFMNdWqqy9aWxUlaZARAg0zAKDanO7PwOGcKqJxJKWL3U/l5GL/hwCdHAF8 EY9IzMQp6cZBzNuUFu/RCWQ= =CtAE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2VXyA7JGja7B50zs--