From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Aug 3 12:59:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04AB37B663 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 12:59:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA38322; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 21:59:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) To: dg@root.com Cc: jgarman@wedgie.org, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.1-ISO References: <200008030502.WAA23582@implode.root.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 03 Aug 2000 21:59:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: David Greenman's message of "Wed, 02 Aug 2000 22:02:02 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Greenman writes: > Lightning is fairly small and much of its traffic defaults through > AboveNet. One of the ISPs I use has a direct circuit to AboveNet, the other goes through two hops at TeleGlobe, so I'm pretty happy with latency and throughput, but I'm not too happy about supporting AboveNet in any way, if what's been said about their competitive practices (MAPS vs. ORBS) is true. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message