From owner-cvs-all Tue Jan 8 2:20:13 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919D637B41C; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 02:20:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA05733; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:20:04 +1100 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:20:46 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: John Baldwin Cc: , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/etc.sparc64 disktab rc.sparc64 ttys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020108210906.T4770-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > On 08-Jan-02 Bruce Evans wrote: > > Disks aren't machine-dependent, so the disktab files should be uncloned, > > not cloned. The old ones are identical except for different bitrot > > in them: > > alpha version: missing minimum3 and orb2200 relative to i386 version; > > orb2200 probably shouldn't exist > > ia64 version: missing zip250 relative to the alpha version; zip250 > > certainly shouldn't exist > > I agree, would you rather we have a single disktab then? Yes. We could also delete some old cruft from it. Who would want a 100MB IDE disk? Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message