From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 18:30:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA757A6B for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:30:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com) Received: from mail.intertainservices.com (mail.intertainservices.com [69.77.177.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08142D01 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd.local (unknown [172.16.10.114]) by mail.intertainservices.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4C7A56441 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:30:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <5279393D.3080701@intertainservices.com> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:30:21 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10.0-BETA1 i386 on VirtualBox References: <526939BF.4030306@dat.pl> <20131105070222.GW59496@kib.kiev.ua> <20131105070608.GI1467@glebius.int.ru> <201311051215.40336.breton@cynicmansion.ru> <20131105090904.GN1467@glebius.int.ru> <20131105092433.GP1467@FreeBSD.org> <20131105174554.GX59496@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20131105174554.GX59496@kib.kiev.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-intertainservices-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-intertainservices-MailScanner-ID: B4C7A56441.ADE6B X-intertainservices-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-intertainservices-MailScanner-From: mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:30:29 -0000 On 11/05/13 12:45, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > This is not the fix, it is rather a masking for a bug. Right now, I > am even more sure that the issue is in vbox. > > And still, anybody able to get the problem on amd64 guest ? I have run numerous versions of 10 (64bit) inside VirtualBox without any issues, the only problem I have is that virtualbox additions don't compile on 10.