From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 15 18:49:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FACD16A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:49:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zeus.acuson.com (ac17860.acuson.com [157.226.71.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF34843D46 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:49:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from DavidJohnson@Siemens.com) Received: from mvaexch01.acuson.com ([157.226.230.208]:1952) by zeus.acuson.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1D16Wf-0002K6-4o; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:30:17 -0800 Received: by mvaexch01.acuson.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:28:06 -0800 Message-ID: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AFA@mvaexch01.acuson.com> From: Johnson David To: 'Astrodog' , freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:48:52 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: RE: SPAM: Score 2.6: Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:49:47 -0000 From: Astrodog [mailto:astrodog@gmail.com] > > NIS/NIS+/LDAP, can all do this quite well. Combined with NFS... hot > damn, you have the same thing, except minus the whole > overhead/multiuser issue below Back when my division was a Solaris shop (even on the desktop) of 1200 employees, that's what we did. Five IT guys handled it all (client and server). But now that we're a Windows shop with only 900 employees, we need 20 MCSEs to keep everything running. David