From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 24 22:44:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D27816A420; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:44:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F397643D55; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A22BC7A; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1OMhxNO001744; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:44:01 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Jason Evans From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:07:45 PST." <06424916-2FC9-4A31-A109-654682BFC1C4@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:43:59 +0000 Message-ID: <1743.1140821039@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: Mike Jakubik , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Peter Fraser , Mark Kirkwood Subject: Re: Virtual memory consumption (both user and kernel) in modern CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:44:14 -0000 In message <06424916-2FC9-4A31-A109-654682BFC1C4@freebsd.org>, Jason Evans writes: >I did some quick experiments last night, where I booted a -current >system with phkmalloc, then with jemalloc. The total increase in >resident memory was negligible, on the order of kilobytes. Running which applications ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.