Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:14:37 +0100 From: Alex Kiesel <alex.kiesel@document-root.de> To: Tim Aslat <tim@spyderweb.com.au> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ability for maintainers to update own ports Message-ID: <1068592477.528.1.camel@boost.home.ahk> In-Reply-To: <20031112081042.513ebdc5.tim@spyderweb.com.au> References: <1068458390.38101.19.camel@dirk.no.domain> <20031112081042.513ebdc5.tim@spyderweb.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 22:40, Tim Aslat wrote: > In the immortal words of Sam Lawrance <boris@brooknet.com.au>... > > Pick it to bits, if there are solutions I want to find them :) > > The biggest problem I can see is that CVS is our biggest limitation. > Surely it wouldn't be too hard to add functionality into CVS which would > allow per directory r/w permissions on some kind of > user/group based authentication. Directory based permissions are supported in CVS through the commitinfo-script. The PHP-Group, for examples, implemented a karma system for their source tree, and FreeBSD utilizes a similar system IIRC. - Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1068592477.528.1.camel>