Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:23:46 +0100
From:      Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: How are [MAINTAINER] patches handled and why aren't PRs FIFO?
Message-ID:  <BANLkTinziPLD=bTbnD3RCmZBoA3N-7_WaA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110428190745.GE77343@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com>
References:  <4DB7B237.7000603@marino.st> <BANLkTinoGufNYZmkFgQmwGR4RjBXWXcDTA@mail.gmail.com> <20110427075436.70ae18ac@seibercom.net> <4DB96EC9.8000506@FreeBSD.org> <20110428190745.GE77343@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 Apr 2011 20:08, "Chip Camden" <sterling@camdensoftware.com> wrote:
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I understand it committers have commit
> privilege for all ports.  What if certain qualified port maintainers who
> aren't committers were nevertheless given commit access for only the leaf
> ports that they maintain?  Wouldn't that speed up the overall process?
>

Search the archives for an answer or ten.

Chris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTinziPLD=bTbnD3RCmZBoA3N-7_WaA>