From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 22:11:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF820EA6 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 22:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tensor.andric.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC430259 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 22:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::ad2b:8d8e:bb8:c23a] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:ad2b:8d8e:bb8:c23a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A21365C2E; Sun, 5 Apr 2015 00:11:43 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Will ASAN MFC to 10-STABLE? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CE14A0AF-4ABA-4FA8-B894-AB34E414DAC1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6 From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 00:11:33 +0200 Message-Id: <486B7716-6548-40D1-9ECE-1A7D997EFFC0@FreeBSD.org> References: To: Kevin Bowling X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 22:11:49 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_CE14A0AF-4ABA-4FA8-B894-AB34E414DAC1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 04 Apr 2015, at 23:30, Kevin Bowling = wrote: >=20 > I believe the last bits needed to try clang's ASAN feature is the = clang-rt stuff. Will this MFC with a clang 3.5 or 3.6 MFC? It depends on whether we will ever MFC the most recent version of clang to stable/10. Since clang 3.5.0 and later require C++11 support, doing this will make it more difficult to upgrade from 9.x to 10.x, and not everybody agrees that it is worth the trouble. Once 9.x is EOL (expected at the end 2016), it might cease to be an issue, though. :-) -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_CE14A0AF-4ABA-4FA8-B894-AB34E414DAC1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.27 iEYEARECAAYFAlUgYZ4ACgkQsF6jCi4glqNrKQCeJQcEJwzwhq74F7YWmHDIeLmc HKIAnAwBBgPFnXqxNXInffFNuAZtdj4+ =a5Zf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_CE14A0AF-4ABA-4FA8-B894-AB34E414DAC1--