From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 4 14:52:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9004B15469 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 14:52:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA96015; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:52:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id PAA05310; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:52:10 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199908042152.PAA05310@harmony.village.org> To: David Scheidt Subject: Re: Building a new kernel Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Aug 1999 16:15:05 CDT." References: Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 15:52:10 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message David Scheidt writes: : Read the docs? Who me? It sounds like the 3.X to 4.0-RELEASE documentation : should say not to do this. Unless, of course, gcc-2.95 is imported before : t hen. Give me a F*ing break. No such documetation exists and the more that we change in how things traditionally the more problem's we'll have. gcc 2.95 is the same thing as egcs, so that wouldn't matter... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message