From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Feb 15 00:10:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF0F247A8D for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 00:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-arm@sentry.org) Received: from shadow.sentry.org (shadow.sentry.org [210.8.237.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "shadow.sentry.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48K9cK1ZRbz4TW6 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 00:10:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-arm@sentry.org) Received: from shadow.sentry.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shadow.sentry.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01F09uKd029980 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:09:56 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from freebsd-arm@sentry.org) Subject: Re: RPI4 vs AMLOGIC s905x2 / x96max To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <7E7605DC-021D-448A-8459-8EC26BA9836D.ref@yahoo.com> <36CF6E4B-5607-4752-B2DF-C265BCFB95BA@yahoo.com> <1BE59567-E669-4A88-8389-2E321B0AC1AE@yahoo.com> <27BE7BAF-FD2C-41C6-B270-4BAF77D1FB0C@yahoo.com> <7465BC0D-3F4C-4CD9-B614-0DF321C94331@yahoo.com> <876C4DBE-A243-425A-9978-209C24387668@yahoo.com> <32D0E068-2E1E-46AA-A907-7974BF4DC46D@yahoo.com> <2DC3F5F2-11EB-44A4-BC45-F5A1E92B509B@googlemail.com> <3333F8A8-591F-4722-9E63-904414974142@yahoo.com> <7B94C1A8-8523-4993-9074-222358FD5C97@googlemail.com> From: Trev Message-ID: <8d070242-9bc6-a301-8176-2a9511e81aee@sentry.org> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:09:56 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (shadow.sentry.org [0.0.0.0]); Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:09:56 +1100 (AEDT) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48K9cK1ZRbz4TW6 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-arm@sentry.org designates 210.8.237.106 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-arm@sentry.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.06 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sentry.org]; IP_SCORE(-2.76)[ip: (-8.63), ipnet: 210.8.0.0/15(-4.37), asn: 2764(-0.82), country: AU(0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2764, ipnet:210.8.0.0/15, country:AU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 00:10:10 -0000 Adrian Gassmann wrote on 15/02/2020 06:24: > > the rpi4 is not interesting in terms of price the x96max USB 3 Received > 1000MBPS Man today for $ 30 invest better there I don't think anyone suggested that the RPi4 was the most interesting or even the best specified, and certainly not the best documented, SBC. It just happens to be the most widely available (locally in most countries) and most popular overall.