From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 18:39:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 268ABBD8; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA6ECC05; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h11so4085632wiw.1; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:39:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XjycvC+22Y4ln+n4ukpSkmPYEPtx81E0VI4I8LFOOHQ=; b=zA5NZVWdD77s08Kp086BC/N36VCUNj8bTHqzXMdjoyjc12ClLSJN5Sd7Ruuk0kvWZw szKI/ewOUYYtz+d/ewYUZOv1urzoGFV9ID/cGB4qbpIoEozWCVZvlfwTBOoN67eK78ky G5Z2Mb2C8oRJEu3IbEiY2M8SemQ6I4Z+yR+FVCVfe12E6Dt0bxnyWRoVheIX21WZFTLO EXixTs51JYD/1ebk3WTcxJBDdP3mHp0LSdFigafGQe7bArIBZGXBCZudGdSIyBzf/pCo eUDJmj+ycMEbTeaucQL2SU52mRnhcryYhUWPl7UA6BwZD5AU11MobIFD9wJdduTxO8x1 WKzw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.108.9 with SMTP id hg9mr34418312wjb.68.1420828776975; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:39:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.41.136 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:39:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20150104234107.Q82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:39:36 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: HjOO9HZ6TwL3Rn52t2PIpQNyNiE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bug 162859] [acpi] ACPI battery/acline monitoring partialy working (switching) From: Adrian Chadd To: Juris Kaminskis , Jung-uk Kim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , Ian Smith X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 18:39:39 -0000 Hm, +jkim. Any ideas? On 7 January 2015 at 10:23, Juris Kaminskis wrote: > 2015-01-05 17:27 GMT+02:00 Juris Kaminskis : > >> >> 2015-01-04 15:17 GMT+02:00 Ian Smith : >> > >> > On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:45:05 +0000, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: >> > >> > Please excuse this off-'zilla merely speculative response. No time, but >> > I've spent (wasted?) some time chasing a couple of these outside the PR. >> > >> > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162859 >> > > >> > > --- Comment #14 from juris --- >> > > Problem on /head/ branch is introduced with revision 216942. >> > >> > If true (in all cases) this is great news for those with a variety of HP >> > laptops that have been experiencing partial - or in some cases complete >> > after boot - failures in CMBAT monitoring since 9.0. And a Macbook Pro. >> > >> > So, reverting rev 216942 fixes it for you? On what FreeBSD version? >> >> I have compiled head branch revision 216941 and battery status via >> acpiconf works. When compiling from source revision 216942 acpiconf stops >> responding. I also tried to remove r216942 and compiled from source release >> 9.3, but there battery status was not working. Apparently there are more >> things than just one that breaks HP ACPI . >> > > Sorry for my previous email that was confusing. I did not revert r216941 > when compiled release 9.3. So when I did that, battery status works. I also > compiled release 10.1 with excluding r216942, and battery status works. So > this single change for some reason creates problem for HP laptops. > >> > >> > >> > If so, with scant comprehension of the code, questions that occur: >> > >> > a) did that revision fix some existing problem, the reverting of which >> > might reestablish problem/s in other machines? jkim? >> > >> > b) what is it in various HP ACPI implementations that don't seem to be a >> > reported problem on other hardware, particularly concerning EC handling? >> > >> > c) if this was wrong (for HPs), what would be right? (the hard one :) >> > >> > cheers, Ian >> >> On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:45:05 +0000, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: >> >> Please excuse this off-'zilla merely speculative response. No time, but >> I've spent (wasted?) some time chasing a couple of these outside the PR. >> >> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162859 >> > >> > --- Comment #14 from juris --- >> > Problem on /head/ branch is introduced with revision 216942. >> >> If true (in all cases) this is great news for those with a variety of HP >> laptops that have been experiencing partial - or in some cases complete >> after boot - failures in CMBAT monitoring since 9.0. And a Macbook Pro. >> >> So, reverting rev 216942 fixes it for you? On what FreeBSD version? >> >> If so, with scant comprehension of the code, questions that occur: >> >> a) did that revision fix some existing problem, the reverting of which >> might reestablish problem/s in other machines? jkim? >> >> b) what is it in various HP ACPI implementations that don't seem to be a >> reported problem on other hardware, particularly concerning EC handling? >> >> c) if this was wrong (for HPs), what would be right? (the hard one :) >> >> cheers, Ian >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"