From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Mon Nov 20 02:47:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06BCDDE9BA for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 02:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEA646CD05 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 02:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vAK2laAx046957 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 02:47:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 223752] clang __attribute__((constructor)) gets wrong input parameters Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 02:47:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: markmi@dsl-only.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 02:47:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223752 --- Comment #19 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to dstaesse from comment #18) You are welcome. My guess is that this is outside POSIX completely and is just ABI material for what you are doing. In fact, looking around I found an ARM document indicating an empty parameter list for its .init_array context: Each translation unit provides a fragment of the constructor vector in an = ELF section called .init_array of type SHT_INIT_ARRAY (=3D0xE) and section flags SHF_ALLOC + SHF_WRITE. Each element of the vector contains the address of a function of type exte= rn =E2=80=9CC=E2=80=9D void (* const)(void) that, when called, performs part o= r all of the global object construction for the translation unit. Producers must treat .init_ar= ray sections as if they were read-only. ( http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0041e/IHI0041E_cppabi= .pdf page 19 of 24.) So, not portable across all ABIs that have .init_array . --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=