From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 10 08:31:52 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31A216A419;
	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:31:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ted@omval.tednet.nl)
Received: from omval.tednet.nl (omval.tednet.nl
	[IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1:200:39ff:fe59:b187])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E9A13C45A;
	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:31:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ted@omval.tednet.nl)
Received: from omval.tednet.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by omval.tednet.nl (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l7A8VmGn009413;
	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:31:49 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ted@omval.tednet.nl)
Received: (from ted@localhost)
	by omval.tednet.nl (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l7A8VmoA009412;
	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:31:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ted)
Message-Id: <200708100831.l7A8VmoA009412@omval.tednet.nl>
From: ted@tednet.nl (Ted Lindgreen)
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:31:48 +0200
In-Reply-To: "Daniel Eischen's message as of Aug  7, 15:41"
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(5) 10/07/98)
To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
	autolearn=ham version=3.2.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on omval.tednet.nl
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:26:30 +0000
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, delphij@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Recent change in less(1)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:31:52 -0000

[Quoting Daniel Eischen, on Aug  7, 15:41, in "Re: Recent change in ..."]
....
> > If so I have a question: how to obtain the former behaviour of the -e
> > switch, i.e. quit when EOF is hit twice always (thus whether or not
> > when the file happens to fit on a single page)?
> 
> Perhaps:
> 
>  	if (less_is_more) {
>  		no_init = TRUE;
>  		if (get_quit_at_eof())
>  			quit_if_one_screen = TRUE;
>  	}

Daniel, are you going to check this fix in?

(Or must we live with broken "-e" functionality in future, in which
case at least the man-page should be updated to reflect the new
behaviour IMHO).

-- ted