Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:12:59 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Network performance comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and Linux Message-ID: <58BE799B.6080002@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <20170307071018.GP15630@zxy.spb.ru> References: <58BE0984.4070208@quip.cz> <20170307071018.GP15630@zxy.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 2017/03/07 08:10: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:14:44AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > >> There is some comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and two versions of >> Linux in specific network benchmark - HTTP/1.1 short lived connections. >> FreeBSD is the worst in this test. >> >> https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/03/06/19425.html >> >> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/1K.png >> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/8K.png >> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/16K.png >> >> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perf_cmp.pdf > > Is this you test? No, it is not mine test. I just found it on the internet. > I mean some congestion in file/page access layer on FreeBSD, can you > re-test w/ about 1000 different files? > I.e. every client request > > http://server/X_K.bin~1 > http://server/X_K.bin~2 > .... > http://server/X_K.bin~1000 > > not just http://server/X_K.bin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?58BE799B.6080002>