From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 23 05:34:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA08312 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 05:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oznet11.ozemail.com.au (oznet11.ozemail.com.au [203.2.192.118]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA08296 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 05:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from richard (slmel51p02.ozemail.com.au [203.108.203.18]) by oznet11.ozemail.com.au (8.8.4/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA07647 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 22:33:59 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <199709231233.WAA07647@oznet11.ozemail.com.au> From: "Richard Lyon" To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: popclient vs fetchmail Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 22:32:57 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1008.3 X-MimeOle: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE Engine V4.71.1008.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I currently upgrading to 2.2.2. Things are going very nicely. I have been upgrading apps to the latest ports. Previously I have used popclient 3.0b6 for downloading mail from a remote pop3 server via user ppp. This has worked well, but I have seen mention that fetchmail is a better alternative. There were some problems and security concerns with earlier versions of popclient, but these seemed to be sorted out. Development of popclient does seem to have stalled. What advantages are there in using fetchmail instead of popclient? Regards ...