From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 23 3:44:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.bart.nl (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183B51504A; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 03:44:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@lucifer.bart.nl) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.bart.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA60132; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:44:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:44:15 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Dave H Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, jmz@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree86 broken? and why not a package? Message-ID: <19991123124415.G58890@lucifer.bart.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from dave@webgator.com on Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 10:46:09PM -0500 Organisation: bART Internet Services B.V. Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [19991123 04:50], Dave H (dave@webgator.com) wrote: >The XFree86 port is marked as broken... bummer.It seemed to build fine for >me (recent stable), so I'm wondering just how broken it really is (and if >it should be marked as broken - perhaps a warning instead?). Fixes have been committed to let it compile again. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator bART Internet Services / Tel: +31 - (0) 10 - 240 39 70 VIA NET.WORKS Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message