From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 29 15:08:40 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310AB3E1
 for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:08:40 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7087D8FC17
 for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:08:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
 [212.40.38.101])
 by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA11944;
 Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:08:27 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <50B77A6A.9050604@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:08:26 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>,
 Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org>
Subject: Re: Some new hardware with 9.1 does not reboot easily
References: <50ACA518.4050309@digiware.nl> <50ACEEFF.8010001@FreeBSD.org>
 <50AD0A20.2070408@digiware.nl> <50AD0AC2.5070804@FreeBSD.org>
 <50AD0B29.6060602@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0F00.5020600@digiware.nl>
 <50AD13EE.8050901@digiware.nl> <50AD17E4.50104@FreeBSD.org>
 <50AD189D.4040902@digiware.nl> <50AD1941.2020108@FreeBSD.org>
 <50ADF362.2040803@FreeBSD.org> <20121123140932.3a6deff6@mr129166>
 <50AF88AA.1060003@FreeBSD.org> <50AFF419.3070604@digiware.nl>
 <50AFF7C1.2090405@FreeBSD.org> <50AFFB9C.8050101@digiware.nl>
 <20121126111052.68136d00@mr129166> <50B3421B.2010606@FreeBSD.org>
 <20121129094137.6829eae8@mr129166> <50B7229D.4090901@digiware.nl>
In-Reply-To: <50B7229D.4090901@digiware.nl>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:08:40 -0000

on 29/11/2012 10:53 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> On 2012-11-29 9:41, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
>> Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:07 +0200,
>> Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> a écrit :
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> on 26/11/2012 12:10 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
>>>> As far I can see it fails because there is no getnewvnode_reserve()
>>>> / get_newvnode_drop_reserve() in 9.1.
>>>
>>> The patch is for stable/9.
>>
>> Ok, thanks.
>>
>> I've made a new diff because Willem's patch does not apply
>> on 9.STABLE (fails on opensolaris_lookup.c) :
>>
>> This one is for 9-stable rev 243569:
>> http://user.lamaiziere.net/patrick/9-STABLE-r243569-patch-zfs-reboot
>>
>> It solves the reboot problem on my server. I'm testing it on my
>> workstation with few "poudriere bulk". It looks to work.

Thank you very much for testing!

> Andriy sent me his diff aginst HEAD, which I reworked against the code I
> have here locally. I did an svn diff against the checkout of that
> morning. And I'm pretty sure i'm tracking stable/9
> 
> So I'm not sure where I went wrong, but thanx for fixing it.

I MFC-ed some ZFS changed from HEAD last weekend.

-- 
Andriy Gapon