From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov  8 21:55:52 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E39C16A403
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  8 Nov 2006 21:55:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from lab.alexdupre.com (lab.alexdupre.com [81.174.31.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E5D43D5A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  8 Nov 2006 21:55:50 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (qmail 59374 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 21:55:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.178.2?) (192.168.178.2)
	by lab.alexdupre.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 21:55:52 -0000
Message-ID: <45525264.3070304@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:55:48 +0100
From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061018)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randall Stewart <rrs@cisco.com>
References: <45524517.1060501@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <45524517.1060501@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SCTP is in the Tree :-)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 21:55:52 -0000

Randall Stewart wrote:
> A very good overview of the protocol is given in RFC 3268.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3268.txt?number=3268

To be precise in RFC 3286 ;-)

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3286.txt

--
Alex Dupre