From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 17 09:17:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95A416A40F for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:17:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp) Received: from ns.tydfam.jp (ns.tydfam.jp [61.197.228.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527C613C4AA for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp) Received: from localhost (tyd3.sub.tydfam.jp [192.168.1.3]) by ns.tydfam.jp (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6H8iVFk060919; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:44:31 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20070717.174445.13760098.ken@tydfam.jp> To: jroberson@chesapeake.net From: Ken Yamada In-Reply-To: <20070716233030.D92541@10.0.0.1> References: <20070716233030.D92541@10.0.0.1> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91/3687/Tue Jul 17 16:42:10 2007 on ns.tydfam.jp X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on ns.tydfam.jp Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:17:07 -0000 It works for me! It is Opteron (dual core) x 2 and survived make -j 8 buildworld. Are there any performance comparison data with BSD?