From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 1 14:17:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84DBBF3 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-da0-x229.google.com (mail-da0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E8E8A8 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f41.google.com with SMTP id w4so1090468dam.14 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 07:17:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state; bh=cKWww2eRmx5bvNSBWro4sMgJpFjI0tzMRFVV3uBVCc0=; b=au/MVXq3m47cHKGQJH8UiRcu7EoV+4zU57GzLzBV7Rb+/i6mL0fg95qelTWHA6u+Pg L3uQtiKj9CVYxnTrna0ppzi42ITvPhYEaiC2ns64KHaBqIP5A9ht+JWFt/Xfz3ZJ4yay qlDfzximupHdwpQ4cvuO2Nm1WPFg0+2gxnBnfqNeXC6mmHJPaC3dn9pvL6DgV3ZFOF01 AfuwLwaWIn9CwHEKdX2VUyKC8KNxJ2e79jWps5nrxn3G+eUsJCVOD/HRL9ZEghmRjERY yUY0MHC2yvWnlyxjUd7+pUWaisNQjaUth+GP2AC0CLUFJoNQ3i0J/9WKTOYJeN9aSaui tifA== X-Received: by 10.66.13.35 with SMTP id e3mr19248852pac.186.1364825843233; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 07:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 53.imp.bsdimp.com (50-78-194-198-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.78.194.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lb8sm15496374pab.13.2013.04.01.07.17.20 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Apr 2013 07:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Warner Losh Subject: Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <201304011331.r31DVCJw052856@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:17:18 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <432EFDBB-9CE8-480A-8B6A-8171BA9F4A83@bsdimp.com> References: <201304011331.r31DVCJw052856@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnUWdHQrtJ7nAT2H4WAceICy9mTZm0k4KH+nrdNBM2niQroC3HLxq02YlbSzwGvHtoKMF/w Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, lists@eitanadler.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:17:23 -0000 On Apr 1, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > From: Eitan Adler > Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 00:48:08 -0400 > Subject: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture > To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers = >=20 > should drop support for the i386 architecture for 10.0 to tier 2 > and replace it with the ARM architecture as Tier 1. >=20 > don't care for i386, don't use it anymore. >=20 > Is ARM really ready for tier 1? > Including the ports infrastructure? > Installation images? It is certainly getting close, at least for the newer armv6+ boards. Warner