Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:10:05 -0800 (PST) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images Message-ID: <200003300610.WAA66266@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/12722; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net> To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 01:05:53 -0500 (EST) Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami once stated: = * Well, I did not realize, you can not even _fetch_ the interactive = * ports :-( = =Distfile fetching is part of the package building process. Can't you just say "make fetch" if a things is marked IS_INTERACTIVE? = * It is not only the license -- the script will extract the source = * code out from itself, only if the license is accepted. It can be = * hacked not to, but that's very likely to violate the license... =Um, can't you put the license part only in REQ? Then the script run =after it can do whatever you want it to. I can, but the license needs to be accepted before the source is extracted. Take a look for yourself... =Also, I wasn't paying attention to the discussion, but what happens =when the user installs it from a package? That's the thing. The license allows redistribution in source or otherwise, even as part of another product, even for (reasonable fee) -- try to build it and read for yourself :) -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003300610.WAA66266>