From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 3 16:31:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F191065676 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 16:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-gh0-f182.google.com (mail-gh0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2358D8FC19 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 16:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbz22 with SMTP id z22so1254797ghb.13 for ; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:31:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ALGuV6CQ2qbUf0nsOp2pD8iAvAt2NKtZwsnyGqHIY+Y=; b=bZAIbM1y2mZf6H+/QaoYNJpSljqQLkHMRbu6ia6ZxeWhZ7aacmt+PM2SlRBqemrb7+ pzy5By6IHEkikbRKYWpmtMIN0LCrJCeHaXh8vd3Pr2696tfIdJjh8xcRUlyCQnNtmnaD cMUUss880GrrYpur0xmdjkj3l4gV9R0bhVMqU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ALGuV6CQ2qbUf0nsOp2pD8iAvAt2NKtZwsnyGqHIY+Y=; b=BWWLDe4eF6B5neh03tdgn+pk5DjmBcZU7DQQN+ACagbtTfFqW1ltol0vo2bWn6wfFF ij6thrRmLJQeTQZHju6cSeF49tM1XMx+7QTEWNKvoPCVOMvOEYaNWvl/YacPcJSJB3wU QNqNtZIqeYuVCQIkVvuVHNy4cTVY8XNFCnyAgKNARiTGlz5lk7Wtw1lf7t8AlTJMp1Ro xOz+dazgCHf82IDq+Uj3UE+JzRDgmd5RHJEKFhgpgqUe08qmJZ8EQ09XDxZZrdAc0ptb s9MRRZGNppHFWAR6NE9z3rXS2oHhgVL/DBpIrvb4B5LqI1hOy4qb6wxf6ROYyIE/kzQl 6feA== Received: by 10.66.73.5 with SMTP id h5mr384239pav.79.1344011483960; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:31:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.67.52 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:30:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <501BD9E3.305@FreeBSD.org> References: <501BAFBD.3010008@FreeBSD.org> <501BD9E3.305@FreeBSD.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:30:53 -0700 Message-ID: To: Gabor Kovesdan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQndNy2PYZaR444aHXXFs0WSGumLlHN6aS1Um2M12fmSCBAgCwBilWv9F19c+orbiwBIT8De Cc: doc@freebsd.org, "Simon L. B. Nielsen" , www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: doc/www cleanup X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:31:25 -0000 On 3 August 2012 07:02, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >>> 4, Stricter XHML: I don't propose going directly to XHTML Strict 1.0 but >> >> Eh, why would you go to XHTML at all considering it's basically >> deprecated in favor for HTML5 (yes, there is no standard for that, but >> still..). There is a standard. The WHATWG maintains it here: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/ > I can think of two reasons: > (1) It is the trivial and straight way to go to XHTML for now. HTML5 would > be a bigger jump that should be tested more carefully. The current plan is > to do the migration in several phases for better QA. For example, for now we > are only going to DocBook 4.2/XML, which can still be used with Jade and > DocBook DSSSL. Going to full XML-based standards and newer DocBook version > will be a next step that requires more testing. It is harder to move to XHTML than it is to move to HTML5. > (2) Are you sure HTML5 is supported in all browsers that our users use? For > example, I sometimes use links and I imagine other people may do so, as > well. We should investigate this more. I am reasonably sure browsers support HTML5 due to the fact that HTML5 largely documents *how things already work*. -- Eitan Adler