Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 23:12:04 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: securelevel & IP filter Message-ID: <199704031317.FAA21733@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm aware of the kernel recognising securelevel having a value of -1, 0, 1 or 2 and above but are there any plans for implementing something more than this ? It has been suggested that IP Filter disallow changes to filter rules if securelevel is set to some level...(I think 3 was the suggestion). However, before doing this, I want to poll people on whether they think three is appropriate, or should 10 be used (say) as a synonym for "firewall security level". Thoughts ? Darren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704031317.FAA21733>