Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:56:17 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QXJ0dXIgQmHEhw==?= <artur@ebasoft.com.pl> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need info about ACPI - implementing, done .... Message-ID: <47A073F1.2020701@ebasoft.com.pl> In-Reply-To: <479F7B2A.2070900@root.org> References: <200801261837.26708.artur@ebasoft.com.pl> <1201387323.7237.2.camel@localhost> <200801280411.29358.artur@ebasoft.com.pl> <479F7B2A.2070900@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Lawson pisze: > Artur Bać wrote: >> There is no ACPI , there is Microsoft invention combo of ACPI+WMI+MOF >> so we call acpi method which calls wmi method with code located in >> bios or embbeded as MOF data into acpi ... > > Yeah, it would be better to implement a generic WMI driver and then call > it from your wireless switch driver. Not all laptops will support this > method of calling into WMI via ACPI since it's not a standard. > After reading ... http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03020.pdf I'm frustrated with the knowlege that Hi was able/he tryed to make my privte hardware, laptop making useles in areas where it suits me best. This article shows why there is a mix of WMI+ACPI in my laptop, and why we are unable to use only ACPI to take the best from it. He is realy a big sucker.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47A073F1.2020701>