From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 1 13:14:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA16429 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 1 Sep 1998 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA16408 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 1998 13:14:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA097966855; Tue, 1 Sep 1998 15:07:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 15:07:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Jonathan Weaver Cc: Studded , Terry Lambert , isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anyone running FrontPage with Apache on stable/current? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 31 Aug 1998, Jonathan Weaver wrote: > All we had to do to get it running was Download Apache, apply the FP > patch, (and extensions) and we were up and running. No problems, didn't > take much time at all. In comparison I've also setup a IIS server on NT.. > I wouldn't touch THAT with a ten foot pole. The installation was click > happy, it's just the part about it crashing under even moderate loads. For stability and such, unix whomps NT, but... > IMHO, Frontpage works better under unix than it does on IIS. =) Three words: Active Server Pages, try them in *nix. - bill fumerola [root/billf]@chc-chimes.com - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800)252.2421 x128 / bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - BF1560 - "Logic, like whiskey, loses its beneficial effect when taken in too large quantities" -Lord Dunsany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message