From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 16 3:36:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7421537B424 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 03:36:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3GAa3U01200; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:36:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Seigo Tanimura Cc: bright@wintelcom.net, dillon@earth.backplane.com, riel@conectiva.com.br, bsddiy@21cn.com, Tor.Egge@fast.no, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vm balance In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2001 19:24:07 +0900." <200104161024.f3GAO7Z34787@rina.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:36:03 +0200 Message-ID: <1198.987417363@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200104161024.f3GAO7Z34787@rina.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, Seigo Tanim ura writes: >Those pieces of work were done in the last weekend, and the patch at > >Seigo> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/vnrecycle.diff > >has been updated and now ready to commit. I'm a bit worried about the amount of work done in the cache_purgeleafdirs(), considering how often it is called, Do you have measured the performance impact of this to be an insignificant overhead ? Once we have that figured out I will commit the patch for you... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message