From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 20 16:08:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B6D37B401 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 16:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta06bw.bigpond.com (mta06bw.bigpond.com [139.134.6.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A9643FB1 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 16:08:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: from areilly.bpc-users.org ([144.135.24.78]) by mta06bw.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mta06bw Jul 16 2002 22:47:55) with SMTP id HDO0AP00.AQ4 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:08:49 +1000 Received: from CPE-144-132-191-61.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([144.132.191.61]) by bwmam04bpa.bigpond.com(MailRouter V3.2g 35/46101673); 21 Apr 2003 09:09:56 Received: (qmail 93169 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2003 23:08:49 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (andrew@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Apr 2003 23:08:49 -0000 From: Andrew Reilly To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20030420095512.GB40279@sunbay.com> References: <001e01c30690$816f5400$0200a8c0@travel> <1050824025.23490.6.camel@gurney.reilly.home> <20030420095512.GB40279@sunbay.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1050880128.23490.11.camel@gurney.reilly.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 21 Apr 2003 09:08:49 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: Anton Zavrin Subject: Re: Broken buildworld in groff, 4.8-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 23:08:54 -0000 Hi Ruslan, On Sun, 2003-04-20 at 19:55, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > I see that your second "mkdep" command is damaged. It looks like > your /etc/make.conf is damaged, probably by redefining CXXFLAGS. > Show us your /etc/make.conf if you don't have CXXFLAGS there. No need, because I did indeed have CXXFLAGS defined (an unsuccessful attempt to get a port to compile with debugging flags). Thanks for pointing that out! With CXXFLAGS removed, everything is happily building again now. If CXXFLAGS isn't it, is there any other equivalent to CFLAGS, that gets used for C++ compilations, or is CFLAGS used to build C++ flags on too? Thanks again, -- Andrew Reilly