From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Sep 10 16:13:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from finch-post-12.mail.demon.net (finch-post-12.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E16814D16 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:13:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aw1@stade.co.uk) Received: from stade.demon.co.uk ([158.152.29.164]) by finch-post-12.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11PZrG-000BOn-0C; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 23:13:31 +0000 Received: from titus.stade.co.uk (titus.stade.co.uk [192.168.1.5]) by stade.demon.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03955; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 23:56:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from aw1@titus.stade.co.uk) Received: (from aw1@localhost) by titus.stade.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA24873; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 23:55:35 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from aw1) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 23:55:35 +0100 From: Adrian Wontroba To: Greg Quinlan Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More SCO Propaganda Message-ID: <19990910235535.A23835@titus.stade.co.uk> Reply-To: aw1@stade.co.uk References: <199909100818.EAA06587@easeway.com> <00be01befb78$87d23460$5214010a@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i In-Reply-To: <00be01befb78$87d23460$5214010a@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk>; from Greg Quinlan on Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 11:37:50AM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-RC Organization: Yes, I need some of that. X-Phone: +(44) 121 681 6677 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org (moving from stable to chat) On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 11:37:50AM +0100, Greg Quinlan wrote: > http://www.sco.com/profservices/linux/ > > I see that SCO is coming to the rescue of OpenSource Unix environments, with > risk assessment, stability, and most of all expertise. > > I quote: > > "we believe that SCO has the largest staff of Open Source experts of any > commercial software vendor." > > "As a founding sponsor of Linux International, SCO is a strong proponent of > the Open Source movement, citing it as a driving force for innovation. Over > the years, SCO has contributed source code to the movement." > > ~~~~~ > > It's just lucky for us that SCO is there to drive forward Open Source!! > (huge sarcasm)!! > > Does anyone know if they done anything for FreeBSD Sability? :) Not all the sarcasm is deserved. Until I saw the light, and the cost benefits, I ran SCO UNIX and then OpenDeathTrap. SCO had quite a positive attitude to what is now called Open Source. Some of their developers were very helpful and active in the SCO news groups and mailing lists. Header files and libraries were available for the base system so that you could use gcc rather than the ever so expensive development system (I think). There were, still are for all I know, the periodic Skunkware CDs, chock full of ported and compiled freeware, which SCO would send to you for free. Their claim to having the largest staff of Open Source experts of any commercial software vendor could well be true. I'm sure that they do believe the Open Source approach and attendant innovation is overall good for them. While they will loose a few sales to organisations who switch to Linux or *BSD, the majority of their customers seem to be prepared to pay lots for the product, and more for support. Yes, a competitor, but a friendly one. They don't seem to have any ambitions to take over the entire OS market, just enlarge their niche. -- Adrian Wontroba To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message