Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 07:20:26 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP - master/slave ports Message-ID: <40D297BA.19075.7FB30FBF@localhost> In-Reply-To: <40D27C4F.7000905@ciam.ru> References: <40D03202.11738.76559182@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 Jun 2004 at 9:23, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > http://beta.freshports.org/ now has support for displaying > > master/slave relationships. This is the first step in automatically > > updating a slave port when a commit is made to a master port. Until > > recently, there was no acceptable method for determing master/slave > > relationship. Consequently, FreshPorts makes no attempt to refresh a > > slave port when the master port is updated. > > Well, it shows master/slave state for my ports right. But port versions > are not equal. This part of work is not done yet? I suspect you are looking at http://www.FreshPorts.org/ (production). The work described above is at http://beta.FreshPorts.org/. I just look there, searched for ports maintained by you, found 21 such ports, checked http://beta.freshports.org/devel/ace+tao/ and found it to be a master port for http://beta.freshports.org/devel/ace/ The master/slave work is just in BETA. It will move to production at a later date. Thank you. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40D297BA.19075.7FB30FBF>